Venom Review

Oct 4, 2018

SHARE THIS POST

Venom (2018)
Sony Pictures

Directed by: Ruben Fleischer
Written by: Scott Rosenburg, Jeff Pinker
Starring: Tom Hardy, Michelle Williams, Riz Ahmed, Woody Harrelson

Review by: Corey Pruitt

“They’re not making a Venom film without Spider-Man. This movie will never be made.”, I scoffed at the screen when Sony first announced the anti-hero’s film in 2017. “You can’t do Venom without Spider-Man…right?”. Turns out I was wrong, you CAN do a Venom film without Spider-Man. However, he needs to be the Lethal Protector. Not the “PG-13 Protector”. LETHAL. Yea he was in a PG-13 movie in that one film that Sam Raimi directed. But guess what? That film also included…SPIDER-MAN! SPIDER-MAN 3! THAT was the name. And so that warranted the lower rating. But without Spider-Man at ALL? We need the Lethal Protector. And that is the BIGGEST issue in Sony’s Venom.

Tom Hardy plays Eddie Brock, a down on his luck loser living in San Francisco but has some sort of weird New York “palooka” accent for some reason. However, all the issues he is having is from his own doing. Sony goes to excruciating lengths to drive the point that he’s a loser from the beginning to the end of the film. So much so that it’s jarring and unnecessary at times. After stumbling upon a conspiracy, Eddie finds himself bonded to an alien species that is called a “symbiote”. The symbiote takes over Eddie’s body, gives itself a name and says that he and Eddie are stuck together so they can eat people. It’s a buddy cop movie but instead of cops, they’re alien cannibal man-eaters. Nice. SURELY this will be bloody, right?

Have you seen this:
Titans Season 3 Red Hood/Jason Todd Transformation Update - Titans News

WRONG. And that was a HUGE gamble from Sony. Making a character whose whole existence is that he’s the ying to another character’s yang is tough to do when you don’t have the yang part. And without that yang, there’s no need to play with the same rules. I feel bad for the director Ruben Fleischer, because throughout the film you can TELL he wanted to do gore. The guy did do Zombieland by the way. And there were obvious scenes that you can tell were supposed to have said blood. Now I’m not some gore fest guy but HAVE YOU SEEN WHAT VENOM LOOKS LIKE? Showing him and what he does without the payload just seems like they’re going out of their way to be PG-13, which they are. And in an age where Logan and Deadpool films are making close to a billion dollars, this seems like a cop-out.

*sigh* You know, I used to BRAG about having 30+ years of comic knowledge. I was alive during some of the best (and worse) moments in comics history. I love when people have questions about old comics and being able to provide them with the location of certain issues to answer their questions. But sometimes this can be a hindrance. And I was reminded of this hinderance when I sat down to watch Sony’s Venom. I don’t like telling people to lower their expectations but…lower your expectations. Still, wish they could have used Spider-Man. Well, let me rephrase that, I wish they could have used TOM HOLLAND Spider-Man. Because Venom is the opposite of Spidey. That’s what makes him WORK. What’s next, a Joker film without Batman? Don’t be ridicu-…

Have you seen this:
Raya and the Last Dragon (Review)

…wait WHAT? Oh COME ON!!!

Did you miss breaking news?We publish new content every day.

Get our daily summary and monthly recap so you never miss out...